Yup i recall....I actually posted a response on my blog that expanded on a response to Mike here, and that column got picked up by some school mag somewhere in your neck of the woods.That imagery drove me to look further into the science and details/data of climate change than I intended.... all those years ago when I first joined TSG.
We had a lot of interesting conversations between us.
I think most of it has been verified over time.
A lot more detail known today.
The deniers back then were a lot more creative ( as in bizarre ), though
I remember still, a lot of Mike's zany logic and claims.
If it was snowing on the other side of the planet, how could climate change be warming? LOL!
Climate was the change in the weather.
Frustrating but so absurd, it was hilarious.....some of thoes claims. wow.
NOAA’s new U.S. Climate Normals give the public, weather forecasters, and businesses a standard way to compare today’s conditions to 30-year averages. Temperature and precipitation averages and statistics are calculated every decade so we can put today’s weather into proper context and make better climate-related decisions.
What a difference a decade makes. Even though 2/3 of the data in the new normals is present in the previous ones, the last decade's still been hot enough to drag the temperatures upwards.
Long a climate change denier, Gohmert in 2015 mocked Democrats Nancy Pelosi and Al Gore over their advocacy to address global warming, saying that more carbon dioxide in the atmosphere was a good thing because it meant “we’ll have more plants.”
1.Never but there are believers.I'm just curious as to WHEN the weather became "climate change"............
And who started this lunacy??
Are you looking for the solution to your computer problem? Join our site today to ask your question. This site is completely free -- paid for by advertisers and donations.
If you're not already familiar with forums, watch our Welcome Guide to get started.
Join over 807,865 other people just like you!