negative acknowledgement to a dhcp server

Status
This thread has been Locked and is not open to further replies. Please start a New Thread if you're having a similar issue. View our Welcome Guide to learn how to use this site.

donnj

Thread Starter
Joined
Sep 16, 2005
Messages
51
How do I Force a client computer to send a negative acknowledgement to a dhcp server ?
 
Joined
Jan 28, 2008
Messages
1,428
Assign it a static ip instead of autoassigned. Though that is not a negative but no dhcp request

I don't believe the client ever sends a negative acknowledgement but the dhcp server does when it has run out of available ips.
 

JohnWill

Retired Moderator
Joined
Oct 19, 2002
Messages
106,429
Actually, the client can send a NAK under certain circumstances. One being if the client requests a specific IP address or requires some specific settings from the DHCP server, and the offer packet mismatches the requirements, the client will decline the offer.

 

JohnWill

Retired Moderator
Joined
Oct 19, 2002
Messages
106,429
OK, it's a decline and not a NAK, I knew it could refuse the offer.
 

donnj

Thread Starter
Joined
Sep 16, 2005
Messages
51
thanks to all for the replys. basically heres the senerio. I have an end user that that is getting an Ip address conflict. advised user to to release and renew. despite this we keep getting the same ip address and without having access to the DHCP server we want to force the dhcp client to ask for a different IP address
 

JohnWill

Retired Moderator
Joined
Oct 19, 2002
Messages
106,429
One of the following things are probably happening.

  1. The DHCP server is not attempting to ping the address before assigning it, and it has no record of that address being assigned.
  2. The IP address in question is assigned to a computer or device that doesn't respond to PING requests.
  3. The IP address in question has been statically assigned within the range of the DHCP server pool.

For SOHO routers, duplicate IP addresses are frequently caused by restarting the router without restarting ALL of the attached workstations and other TCP/IP connected devices.
 

donnj

Thread Starter
Joined
Sep 16, 2005
Messages
51
Thanks for the input the three possibilities have been exausted SR analyst problem now :(y)
 

donnj

Thread Starter
Joined
Sep 16, 2005
Messages
51
thanks for the help Sr analyst considering packet manipulation for this point fwd consider thuis issue Solved
 

JohnWill

Retired Moderator
Joined
Oct 19, 2002
Messages
106,429
You can mark your own threads solved using the thread tools at the top of the page in the upper right corner.© :)

 
Status
This thread has been Locked and is not open to further replies. Please start a New Thread if you're having a similar issue. View our Welcome Guide to learn how to use this site.

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 1)

As Seen On
As Seen On...

Welcome to Tech Support Guy!

Are you looking for the solution to your computer problem? Join our site today to ask your question. This site is completely free -- paid for by advertisers and donations.

If you're not already familiar with forums, watch our Welcome Guide to get started.

Join over 807,865 other people just like you!

Latest posts

Members online

Top