1. Computer problem? Tech Support Guy is completely free -- paid for by advertisers and donations. Click here to join today! If you're new to Tech Support Guy, we highly recommend that you visit our Guide for New Members.

Obama to Israel: Back to 1967

Discussion in 'Controversial Topics' started by pyritechips, May 20, 2011.

Advertisement
  1. pyritechips

    pyritechips Jim Thread Starter

    Joined:
    Jun 2, 2002
    Messages:
    26,858
  2. Littlefield

    Littlefield

    Joined:
    Mar 26, 2006
    Messages:
    13,588
    Obama is delusional if he really thinks Israel will agree to go back to 1967 borders and slit their own throat :D
     
  3. pyritechips

    pyritechips Jim Thread Starter

    Joined:
    Jun 2, 2002
    Messages:
    26,858
    Maybe, but as long as there is a "slit their own throat" mentality prevalent then there will never be any semblance of peace. I really fear that some don't want any peace.
     
  4. Littlefield

    Littlefield

    Joined:
    Mar 26, 2006
    Messages:
    13,588
    Yep, especially when Palestinian terrorists slit the throat of a 3 month old.
     
  5. pyritechips

    pyritechips Jim Thread Starter

    Joined:
    Jun 2, 2002
    Messages:
    26,858
    Indeed, then the Palestinians accuse the Israelis of a missile attack on a market, the the Israelis blame the Palestinians of a suicide attack against a police outpost then the Palestinians...

    ...I think it would start if you didn't play the blame game and not to seek justification for one side's actions by reciting the tired old outrage stories. It proves nothing and solves nothing. Trying to justify one side, or the other, in an endless cycle of retaliatory attacks has proven itself to be futile, deadly and just plain disgusting. What is even more criminal is the attempts - on both sides - by the hard line radicals to scuttle any progress towards peace. They are the true terrorists in this case.
     
  6. Wino

    Wino

    Joined:
    Nov 30, 2001
    Messages:
    18,709
    That would include Clinton and Bush II - same thing they proposed, and have to agree to some extent - Bush, as we all know was totally delusional.:)

    Is irrelevant whether Israel or Pali's agree as both are the major reason for ME problems which the world is growing very bored with. I'm with pyritechips on this - someone doesn't want peace. Probably in fear of losing $3B yearly. While the USA will never drop support of Israel, we really need to cut back on our expenditures to them if they refuse to cooperate in a two state solution.

    With the changing situations in the ME, Israel will mess their skivvies if the Arabs decide Israel has a right to exist (as many already do).
     
  7. eggplant43

    eggplant43

    Joined:
    Mar 10, 2001
    Messages:
    17,192
    I don't think we'll see peace until the people, not the politicians take control. Could there be an Arab Spring within these two nations? The thing that strikes me the most, is that the folks in the ME seem to think in terms of centuries, while the West seems unable to remember from one Superbowl, to the next. This is a real disconnect, and I think the root of our problems there. If you know anything of the history of Afghanistan, you can clearly see this in play.
     
  8. Littlefield

    Littlefield

    Joined:
    Mar 26, 2006
    Messages:
    13,588


    This guys sums it up well and the position Bush held did not support the Palestinians over Israel.
    http://www.nationalreview.com/articles/267700/obama-s-empty-speech-elliott-abrams?page=2
     
  9. Paquadez

    Paquadez

    Joined:
    Jun 9, 2003
    Messages:
    8,713
    Most of us want it to work, Jim.

    However, for this to happen it requires a collective consensus.

    Which has been lacking.

    Far too many selfish political types with a hidden personal and business agenda.

    Meantime, tens of thousands of dispossessed Arabs moulder in effective prison camps with no state, not hope and nothing other than an aspiration to eject the "Invader".

    Ireland provides a ready exemplar: despite a vast majority of the common people desperate for peace to be able to get on with the rest of their lives, the lunatics on the fringe still wish to create mayhem.

    One clear reason for this is dissidents have turned to lucrative crimes (Drugs dealing for one) to support their life.

    They need a continuum of unrest in order to continue working those crimes: with peace, then they are suddenly ejected from the comfortable womb of freedom fighters into the genre of common criminals and thugs.

    Ergo: they continue to foment unrest and mayhem.

    They have lost sight of the primary cause which motivated the original organisations for which they fought: IRA, PIRA, The Real IRA etc. Since fundamentally it no longer exists.

    Thus they must re-create the atmosphere or terror, fear and distrust.

    Same I now fear with Israel and Palestine.

    There are many Israeli billionaires: instead of paying taxes (When they do which seems to be rare), perhaps time for Israel to set up the sort of compensation funds for dispossessed Palestinians whose lands, businesses, homes and possessions were sequestrated by Israel from 1948 on? Rathewr than their vast annual expenditure on war materiél.

    Same as the Israelis demanded from Germany, Switzerland and France et al, post WWII.
     
  10. eggplant43

    eggplant43

    Joined:
    Mar 10, 2001
    Messages:
    17,192
    The Parallels are eerily present. I started out, after reading "Exodus" being a big proponent for Israel, but over the last 20 years, I've come to see the state of Israel as a monster state that parallels much of what happened in South Africa and Apartheid. Their encroachment on the Palestinians by building their settlements, to me, is inhumane, and I condemn them for it.

    That being said, I support our strong support of their nationhood. If I were trimming the budget the annual expenditures on our part would get a very close look.

    I'd also say that the Palestinians truly need to stop killing Israeli's if there is to be any hope for peace.
     
  11. Paquadez

    Paquadez

    Joined:
    Jun 9, 2003
    Messages:
    8,713
    But additionally, the Israelis need to stop treating the Palestinians like the Nazis treated the Jews.

    Any real true peace initiative must be Bipartite.

    Israel over-relies on its Big bro.
     
  12. Wino

    Wino

    Joined:
    Nov 30, 2001
    Messages:
    18,709
    Hey, you left this little tidbit out:

    Doing a bit of cherry picking this morning??:confused::p

    Israel can't be part of the solution if they are the major problem. As Sarah would say, "They need to man up!!":eek::D
     
  13. Littlefield

    Littlefield

    Joined:
    Mar 26, 2006
    Messages:
    13,588
    That is saying Obama is treating our ally Israel as the problem by his view of them not that they really are the problem . I thought you understood English better then that analysis :D
     
  14. Wino

    Wino

    Joined:
    Nov 30, 2001
    Messages:
    18,709
    I understand English, southern drawl, Yankee and Tex-Mex very well, thank you. Didn't say Obama said they were a problem - I'm saying Israel is the problem.
     
  15. Littlefield

    Littlefield

    Joined:
    Mar 26, 2006
    Messages:
    13,588
    I am sure you knew I was referring to the highlighted portion of the quote above and now we know your opinion.
     
  16. Sponsor

As Seen On
As Seen On...

Welcome to Tech Support Guy!

Are you looking for the solution to your computer problem? Join our site today to ask your question. This site is completely free -- paid for by advertisers and donations.

If you're not already familiar with forums, watch our Welcome Guide to get started.

Join over 733,556 other people just like you!

Loading...

Short URL to this thread: https://techguy.org/997857