1. Computer problem? Tech Support Guy is completely free -- paid for by advertisers and donations. Click here to join today! If you're new to Tech Support Guy, we highly recommend that you visit our Guide for New Members.

Solved: Newly found Near Earth asteroid buzzing Earth tonight.

Discussion in 'Random Discussion' started by LANMaster, Apr 8, 2010.

Advertisement
  1. LANMaster

    LANMaster Banned Thread Starter

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2003
    Messages:
    55,854
    Didn't we have something like this from April 6 years ago? I wonder if it is the same rock.

    My concern is not that this thing might hit the earth, but whether or not this could hit our moon.


    Newfound Asteroid to Buzz Earth Thursday

    (today) less than 2 hours from now


    A newly discovered asteroid will zip close by Earth Thursday, but poses no threat of crashing into our planet even though it is passing within the orbit of the moon.

    The asteroid, called 2010 GA6, is a relatively small space rock about 71 feet wide and was discovered by astronomers with the Catalina Sky Survey in Tucson, Az. The space rock will fly within the orbit of the moon when it passes Earth Thursday at 7:06 p.m. EDT (2306 GMT), but NASA astronomers said not to worry...the planet is safe.

    "Fly bys of near-Earth objects within the moon's orbit occur every few weeks," said Don Yeomans of NASA's Near-Earth Object Office at the Jet Propulsion Laboratory in Pasadena, Calif., in a statement.
     
  2. Mumbodog

    Mumbodog

    Joined:
    Oct 3, 2007
    Messages:
    7,889
    Maybe I can catch in my butterfly net.....


    :eek:
     
  3. Stoner

    Stoner Banned

    Joined:
    Oct 26, 2002
    Messages:
    44,931

    I will pray for your good mental health.......as always.....................Jack :D
     
  4. LANMaster

    LANMaster Banned Thread Starter

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2003
    Messages:
    55,854
    Thankie very kindly, as always.

    :D

    I am pleased that this came to nothing.

    But every time I read about a large near-Earth object passing inside the lunar orbit, I never hear if there is any concern of a lunar impact.
    If the object is large enough, I would be truly concerned about that, wouldn't you?

    Or ... do you think that any object that would cause the moon to become a threat, would surely be just as bad to life on earth?

    I can relate to that kind of objective POV, but you have to see that the lunar orbit is a larger target for a hurling object, even if the moon is a smaller one. And clearly it would take a much smaller impact on the moon to cause havok than on the earth.

    My question to YOU is, are you aware if they even CHECK to see if a lunar impact is possible after they determine that the object will miss the earth inside the lunar orbit? Or do these people let down their guard once they determine that it will miss the earth? Or are they in need of mental health examination for even bothering to ponder? :rolleyes:

    Oh ..... and thanks for the rhetorical response :rolleyes:
     
  5. Stoner

    Stoner Banned

    Joined:
    Oct 26, 2002
    Messages:
    44,931
    So am I :D


    Well...if you read more scientific articles, I suspect you would hear about concern, but really.....your reading and posting of extremist anti science blogs has probably blinded you to many aspects of reality.
    And I have pointed out many times in Civ Debate, the elements of reality that you deny because the science offends your fundamentalist religious and extremist political positions......( sigh! )

    My first concern would always focus on the Earth first.

    But that was not your stated position.

    Here it is again:


    Your priorities are bassackward :D




    As a matter of fact, I am aware that trajectories studied include our moon and often most of the solar system
    A good source is JPL.
    http://www.jpl.nasa.gov/asteroidwatch/newsfeatures.cfm?release=2549
    Be fearful, though.....it's about science and mathematics ( :D )


    That info is left to chance by most science haters but their chicken little philosophies often bring their inner most fears to the surface at the darnedest times :D

    Seriously.....quit hating the physical laws of nature so much and learn about them.....it makes life more enjoyable for everyone :D_:D_:D_:D


    :D
    I will pray for your good mental health, anyway :D
     
  6. Bernardo

    Bernardo

    Joined:
    Jan 8, 2006
    Messages:
    4,221
    Don't most of Lannie's posts come to nothing? :p
     
  7. Wino

    Wino

    Joined:
    Nov 30, 2001
    Messages:
    19,404
    That would describe the start, middle and end.:)
     
  8. Bernardo

    Bernardo

    Joined:
    Jan 8, 2006
    Messages:
    4,221
    (y)
     
  9. LANMaster

    LANMaster Banned Thread Starter

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2003
    Messages:
    55,854
    :rolleyes:


    Note that I specified THIS INSTANCE whereas the object was not expected to impact earth.

    Your spin is bassackwards.

    I appreciate the first part in spite of the second. :D

    Honestly, I love science.
    Your constant bashing me for hating science shows your ugly bias. :p

    In this instance, I only looked at the news source. Never have I seen the lunar concern mentioned in a news article. I will look for it at JPL. It should be a huge concern for those near miss objects that travel within the Moon's orbit, don't you think?

    :rolleyes:

    I appreciate any prayers that you wish to send up to our creator. (y) May God bless you as well. :)
     
  10. Stoner

    Stoner Banned

    Joined:
    Oct 26, 2002
    Messages:
    44,931
    This is one of your better rebuttals.
    Words too frequently seem to trip you up :D

    The object wasn't expected to hit the moon either, but you posted...in bold :
    "My concern is not that this thing might hit the earth, but whether or not this could hit our moon. "

    No wonder your science hating threads in Civ Debate look so wonky :D_

    That's right.....just go on denying reality :D


    :Ds


    LOL!
    (Good one that we can all enjoy :D )


    Let's review what you just posted:
    'I bash you because you hate science.'
    OK.....Yes....I do.

    But:
    "shows your ugly bias "
    is a non sequitur . It's your hatred of the sciences that conflict with your fundamentalist religious beliefs and your neocon/corporate socialist politics that is of that nature :)
    And my bias against ignorance could hardly be called ugly.




    I realize that.
    I realize that just about every time you post anything that concerns science :D


    That's not my fault!
    Moonbattery and gatewaypundit really aren't the greatest scientific sources to start with.
    Try a google search next time :D

    Great :)
    See how easy it is to learn ( :D )



    See how easily I changed your mind? :D_:D_:D
     
  11. brillser

    brillser

    Joined:
    Mar 24, 2008
    Messages:
    2,423
    I've heard that the chances of us actualy being aware of a projectile hitting us are minimal, but what does this mean:
    Bassackwards?
     
  12. Stoner

    Stoner Banned

    Joined:
    Oct 26, 2002
    Messages:
    44,931
    'bassackwards'

    It has the appearance of looking less vulgar while underlining incredibly flawed logic with humor.

    'assbackwards'
     
  13. brillser

    brillser

    Joined:
    Mar 24, 2008
    Messages:
    2,423
    Thanks Stoner. Hope all is well.
     
  14. LANMaster

    LANMaster Banned Thread Starter

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2003
    Messages:
    55,854
    You link indicates no concern or otherwise relating to how close the object would come to the moon itself. Only some contradictory statements that call it out as outside the moon's orbit, then inside the moon's orbit, as it relates to the distance from the earth.

    Nowhere on the entire JPL site have I been able to find any concern or otherwise whatsoever with any lunar impact of any object.

    Yoe posted;
    I'd like to know where you have read anything regarding a lunar impact by any object other than an earth launched one.

    Perhaps you could find something like that for me on their site? Surely you have read something at JPL that speaks to my concern.
     
  15. Stoner

    Stoner Banned

    Joined:
    Oct 26, 2002
    Messages:
    44,931



    Typical....you didn't actually read the very first paragraph and relied on the pretty images :D_:D_:D



    [​IMG][/quote]
     
  16. Sponsor

As Seen On
As Seen On...

Welcome to Tech Support Guy!

Are you looking for the solution to your computer problem? Join our site today to ask your question. This site is completely free -- paid for by advertisers and donations.

If you're not already familiar with forums, watch our Welcome Guide to get started.

Join over 733,556 other people just like you!

Short URL to this thread: https://techguy.org/915666

  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice