Solved: Weird, non-important, curiosity question

Status
This thread has been Locked and is not open to further replies. Please start a New Thread if you're having a similar issue. View our Welcome Guide to learn how to use this site.

apr911

Thread Starter
Joined
Jan 25, 2007
Messages
75
So I was responding to a post today regarding an resolution at 1680x1050...

Why do they call monitors with this resolution 16:10? Wouldnt they be 8:5? Thoughts? Opinions?

Again, this is a strange anomaly/curiosity question designed purely to get you to think. The answer does not affect me one way or the other.
 
Joined
Nov 30, 2006
Messages
941
I guess it is 16:10 because the first two numbers of the resolution make this up. 1680x1050. It isn't 8:5 due to the fact that the first two numbers are the thousands and hundreds, which is a closer description than using the tens and ones unit and better represents the true value.

Thousands Hundreds Tens Units

1 6 8 0
x
1 0 5 0
 

apr911

Thread Starter
Joined
Jan 25, 2007
Messages
75
MaverickUK said:
I guess it is 16:10 because the first two numbers of the resolution make this up. 1680x1050. It isn't 8:5 due to the fact that the first two numbers are the thousands and hundreds, which is a closer description than using the tens and ones unit and better represents the true value.

Thousands Hundreds Tens Units

1 6 8 0
x
1 0 5 0
While your arguement makes sense, with that theory, a 1280x1024 should be 12x10 not 5:4 and 1024x768 and 800x600 should be 10x7 and 8x6 respectively not 4:3
 
Joined
Aug 17, 2003
Messages
17,584
The aspect ratio is expressed in terms of current video standards, being 4:3 and 16:9.

Therefore it's not uncommon to see 16:10 to denote an aspect ratio, on the basis that the 16:9 is a norm and it makes the variation somewhat more understandable, but 8:5 would be acceptable.
 
Joined
Dec 8, 2006
Messages
4,469
apr911 said:
So I was responding to a post today regarding an resolution at 1680x1050...

Why do they call monitors with this resolution 16:10? Wouldnt they be 8:5? Thoughts? Opinions?

Again, this is a strange anomaly/curiosity question designed purely to get you to think. The answer does not affect me one way or the other.
Closer to 17:11 than 16:10, which is probably why it isn't 8:5
 
Status
This thread has been Locked and is not open to further replies. Please start a New Thread if you're having a similar issue. View our Welcome Guide to learn how to use this site.

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 1)

As Seen On
As Seen On...

Welcome to Tech Support Guy!

Are you looking for the solution to your computer problem? Join our site today to ask your question. This site is completely free -- paid for by advertisers and donations.

If you're not already familiar with forums, watch our Welcome Guide to get started.

Join over 807,865 other people just like you!

Latest posts

Staff online

Members online

Top