Taliban Philosophy vs. US Philosophy

Joined
Sep 19, 2001
Messages
2,469
Mulder...Here is the actual speech...It is a shame that the America of 2001 doesn't have the balls of the America of 1944...



Patton Speaks To The Troops - England, May 31, 1944

"Now I want you to remember that no ******* ever won a war by dying for his country. You won it by making the other poor dumb ******* die for his country. Men, all this stuff you've heard about America not wanting to fight, wanting to stay out of the war, is a lot of horse dung. Americans traditionally love to fight. ALL REAL Americans, love the sting of battle. When you were kids, you all admired the champion marble shooter, the fastest runner, the big league ball players, the toughest boxers . . . Americans love a winner and will not tolerate a loser. Americans play to win all the time. I wouldn't give a hoot in Hell for a man who lost and laughed. That's why Americans have never lost and will never lose a war. Because the very thought of losing is hateful to Americans. Now, an army is a team. It lives, eats, sleeps, fights as a team. This individuality stuff is a bunch of crap. The bilious *******s who wrote that stuff about individuality for the Saturday Evening Post, don't know anything more about real battle than they do about fornicating. Now we have the finest food and equipment, the best spirit, and the best men in the world. You know . . . My God, I actually pity those poor *******s we're going up against. My God, I do. We're not just going to shoot the *******s, we're going to cut out their living guts and use them to grease the treads of our tanks. We're going to murder those lousy Hun *******s by the bushel. Now some of you boys, I know, are wondering whether or not you'll chicken out under fire. Don't worry about it. I can assure you that you'll all do your duty. The Nazis are the enemy. Wade into them. Spill their blood, shoot them in the belly. When you put your hand into a bunch of goo, that a moment before was your best friends face, you'll know what to do. Now there's another thing I want you to remember. I don't want to get any messages saying that we are holding our position. We're not holding anything, we'll let the Hun do that. We are advancing constantly, and we're not interested in holding onto anything except the enemy. We're going to hold onto him by the nose, and we're going to kick him in the ***. We're going to kick the hell out of him all the time, and we're going to go through him like crap through a goose. Now, there's one thing that you men will be able to say when you get back home, and you may thank God for it. Thirty years from now when you're sitting around your fireside with your grandson on your knee, and he asks you, "What did you do in the great World War Two?" You won't have to say, "Well, I shoveled **** in Louisiana." Alright now, you sons of bitches, you know how I feel. Oh! . . . I will be proud to lead you wonderful guys into battle anytime, anywhere. That's all."
 

Mulderator

Thread Starter
Joined
Feb 20, 1999
Messages
51,023
It is a shame that the America of 2001 doesn't have the balls of the America of 1944...
I'm curious why you say that? I see everyday brave Americans heading over to the middle east to wage war on the Taliban. America now is waging war. I don't think that is fair to say these brave people are any less brave than those in 1944.
 
Joined
Sep 19, 2001
Messages
2,469
Mulder...When & If...you guys ever get done discussing the USS Liberty.....go HERE and read my post, What Is Going Here?.....
Perhaps your wisdom & intuition will help you to decipher the cognition of what I am saying.....& I am not speaking of the obvious literal words you refer to...
 

Mulderator

Thread Starter
Joined
Feb 20, 1999
Messages
51,023
I understand exactly what you are saying--that we should be doing more than we are, but what is that? What did we do in World War II that we are not now doing. You forget that for several years the war in Europe raged and the US endured hostilities against it without entering the war--not until Pearl Harbor. There were the very same criticisms levied back then that the US should have done more earlier and got involved in the war much earlier. This is also very true about World War I, which we stayed out for a long time despite open hostilities. So my point is I don't think we are acting any differently now then we did then.

But this is also a different time period with different considerations. We have world support for the current war with the Taliban and absent sending in ground troops (which will come soon), I don't know what esle we could be doing. Once we rid the world of those insane people, we will continue with an effort to attack terrorism wherever it exists, but first things first.

What more do you think we should be doing? Anyone else?
 
Joined
Sep 19, 2001
Messages
2,469
Mulder....With all due respect....I am not Kirkland.....or DN......

As Quoted By Mulder....I understand exactly what you are saying... You forget that for several years the war in Europe raged and the US endured hostilities against it without entering the war--not until Pearl Harbor. . So my point is I don't think we are acting any differently now then we did then.

But this is also a different time period with different considerations. We have world support for the current war with the Taliban and absent sending in ground troops (which will come soon)...
Please don't disappoint me and tell me what I have forgotten....that is an assumption....coming from a Juris Doctorate of all people.....
I don't think your point about us acting any differently now then we did in 1944 is something you want to boast about Mulder....
There is very little similarity between Pearl Harbor & the Events Of September 11, 2001!
It was not a military target attacked in 2001...& although I can't technically argue the "US Soil" issue...I will at least argue that it was the first time a major US City was attacked on the Mainland.


I agree with you that this is a different time with different considerations.......SEVERE CONDIDERATIONS.....

You see Mulder.....you want to play a game with me....you want to see how much I will say....how far I will go....so then you can give me one of your labels....Right Wing, Left Wing, Conservative....whatever.....and then you feel you have won, which of course....we both know, you must win....this is your "place"...so those are the "unspoken rules"... Please feel free to correct me whenever or wherever or however I might be in error...

We have "World Support" you say....lets really examine this "World Support"....I see the United Kingdom...this I agree with...a handful of other European Countries that must ally themselves with us for many reasons......Do you think when Bush met with most of the European Countries he "asked" or he "told" them what was expected of them?
As for the Middle Eastern Countries......they "harbor, shelter & feed" these terrorists.....Do these words sound familiar? I think I heard them in a speech by a president! Yet you believe & would willingly trust these people??
China.....now thats a good one......after knocking one of our Military Aircraft from the skies & holding its crew hostage.....I sure want to sleep with them!
Russia will do anything to get out of its economic & political disasters it is in....yet why does it still favor Cold War Nuclear Treaties....there must be a valid explanation for this?

I know I left out many countries in this "World Support"...but I am sure you will fill me in.

I know it was just an error you made regarding the ground troops.....they already are there!


As Quoted By Mulder....What more do you think we should be doing?
Mulder....my friend....you didn't really think I would give you that much......did you??? :cool:

I want a clean, long debate on THAT ISSUE!!!

Just remember my friend(s)....There are "Lives In The Balance".....and this time it is yours and mine....not some poor, ignorant, starving soul living in our TV screens...This time it is not "News Reels" in your local Cinema...

You tell me Mulder......What more do you think we should be doing?
 
Joined
Mar 14, 2001
Messages
2,620
How about, instead of saying " Well, I shoveled **** in Louisiana." He says, "Well, I was in the Texas Air National Guard"? :)
 
Joined
Mar 18, 2001
Messages
1,741
Originally posted by DNeurococo
How about, instead of saying " Well, I shoveled **** in Louisiana." He says, "Well, I was in the Texas Air National Guard"? :)
Much better than saying "I was a Rhodes
scholar and didn't inhale"....:rolleyes:
 
Joined
Sep 19, 2001
Messages
2,469
"Taliban Philosophy Vs. US Philosophy"....continued....

From a religious perspective, the Shahada,(martyr) is "the greatest hope in this world" for a Muslim. The martyr earns eternal glory by "dying for the sake of Allah," and is rewarded with eternal life next to his Lord, in accordance with the Koranic verse that opens each installment of the newspaper biographies: "Do not consider those who are slain in the cause of Allah, as dead. Indeed, they are living by their Lord." This statement underpins the martyr's world view: "strive for death and you will receive life."

The Taliban, described the seven rewards the Martyr earns according to Islamic tradition: "From the moment the first drop of his blood is spilled [by the enemy, the martyr] does not feel the pains of the injury and is absolved of all his [bad] deeds; he sees his seat in Paradise; he is saved from the torture of the grave; he is saved from the fear of Day of Judgment; he marries [seventy beautiful] black-eyed [women]; he is an advocate for seventy of his relatives [to reach paradise]; and he earns the Crown of Glory, whose precious stone is better than all this world and everything in it."

The operations of the martyrs are described as noble, heroic deeds carried out against not only soldiers but also against innocent civilians: women, children and the elderly. The Taliban stresses that these were legitimate operations and not terrorism: "We will continue with our resistance for the sake of freedom. We are not terrorists, but we have to respond with force, in order to frighten the enemies of Allah and our enemies - the plunderers of our land and rights. We have love in our hearts towards mankind that is enough to turn the land into a scene of love, peace and justice."

In western eyes, an individual who chooses to commit martyrdom, in order to kill others, is considered a deranged, irrational fanatic. By viewing it in this way analysts underestimate the calculated ideological nature and social framework in which this phenomenon takes place. As this review demonstrates, the Taliban individuals who choose to commit martyrdom adhere to a rigid, highly developed ideological structure whose irrationality lies in its original assumptions. Hence, the choice to commit martyrdom is not motivated by poverty or mental desperation. Rather, it is an act with deep ideological motivations. Moreover, there exists a social and religious framework which, in laying the foundations for a climate of martyrdom, continures to produce an ongoing supply of future suicide bombers.
 

Mulderator

Thread Starter
Joined
Feb 20, 1999
Messages
51,023
JewisHeritage.

You're way too sensitive and you're reading too much into my post. I simply posited a position that I thought the US was doing exactly what they should at this point in response to you're position that it should being doing more but without saying what your position is. My position is stated while yours is unknown. If that's the way you want it fine, but I really don't have any alterior motives here other than voicing my opinion.
 

Mulderator

Thread Starter
Joined
Feb 20, 1999
Messages
51,023
Although I can't deny I enjoy being right, which is about 99 percent of the time--the other 1 percent of the time, DN is right ;)
 

Mulderator

Thread Starter
Joined
Feb 20, 1999
Messages
51,023
BTW JH--you and I agree that Hussein and Arafat should be removed from power--all in good time, my friend, all in good time!
 
Joined
Sep 19, 2001
Messages
2,469
Mulder..

As Quoted By Mulder.....BTW JH--you and I agree that Hussein and Arafat should be removed from power--all in good time, my friend, all in good time!
Yes, we are HARMONIOUS on this issue.....But SOONER is PREFERABLE than LATER!!

As Quoted By Mulder.....in response to you're position that it should being doing more but without saying what your position is.
There must be "Clouds In Your Coffee".....I will work on a better presentation for you in answering/replying to your/this inquiry!..
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 1)

As Seen On
As Seen On...

Welcome to Tech Support Guy!

Are you looking for the solution to your computer problem? Join our site today to ask your question. This site is completely free -- paid for by advertisers and donations.

If you're not already familiar with forums, watch our Welcome Guide to get started.

Join over 807,865 other people just like you!

Latest posts

Staff online

Top