Vista Security Holes .. ?

Status
This thread has been Locked and is not open to further replies. Please start a New Thread if you're having a similar issue. View our Welcome Guide to learn how to use this site.

etch

Thread Starter
Joined
Sep 20, 2008
Messages
35
could anybody help me with this plz , its important for me to know if there is any windows vista security holes and problems ? and how could i solve them -if any-?
coz someone already told me that there r many security holes , just making sure no more.
thx in advance
 
Joined
Dec 11, 2007
Messages
138
By itself, Vista is a pretty secure, stable OS, especially if all security patches are applied.

Every OS has security holes of varying severity.

I would almost say that if an OS has no holes, its just because no one has found them yet.

Best practice would be to apply all OS and application updates (or at least those labelled important/critical), keep your antivirus updated, and leave UAC running.

Remember, a lot of the security problems an OS faces are generated by the applications you run on it.

Finally, every OS is only as secure as its user. Learn how to keep yourself and your data safe online.

If you have any problems, ask, and the good people here will do their best to help you with them.
 
Joined
Oct 3, 2007
Messages
7,889
The biggest security hole in any Operating system is the user.

Vista is secure, but can be compromised by visiting malicious websites, opening email from unknown senders, installing unknown software, ect...
 
Joined
Jun 10, 2007
Messages
251
And to add to all of that...

The only truly 100% secure PC, is one without a hard drive and no power.
in otherwords, one that is unsed or unusable.
 
Joined
Sep 21, 2007
Messages
13,671
Vista has fixed many security holes found in XP. Many security problems has been fixed with redesign.

Internet explorer now runs in protected mode, which gives extremely limited rights to the process, even if the program is launched by an administrator.

UAC now prompts the user before making any system wide changes.

Windows services hardening limits the rights given to services so that even when exploited, the malware have very limited rights.

Bitlocker drive encryption now protects against data leak when laptops are stolen.

You can now limit data theft by disallowing installation of usb flash drives.

Windows Firewall is now a two way stateful firewall.

Address space layout randomization loads code modules into different addresses every time, making it difficult for exploits to work.

There are lots of other structural improvements, and I have converted all my PCs to use Vista precisely because of these improvements.

Like Pillianp says, there will be new security holes discovered as time goes on, and we have to keep our patches up to date. But Vista has a strong security foundation, which is not so with XP.

Basically, security is a race between black hat hackers and white hat hackers. When white hats discovers a security hole they tell MS to patch it. When black hats discover a hole, well, you have a hole, and they'll use it to hack the public. Patched security holes are no longer holes, unless you are stupid enough to turn off Automatic-Updates. Being a white hat does have it's benefits, you get a decent paying job in the security field.

If your friend claims there are many security holes, ask him to demo it against a fully patched system. Maybe he's a blackhat?
 

etch

Thread Starter
Joined
Sep 20, 2008
Messages
35
thx guys for ur infos , i was just curious to know about what microsoft has made to vista to encourage security ... actually i have just 1 point to say , i asked about security holes coz i dont trust microsoft anymore actually , when i see linux versions coming with the least holes ever - and then see that microsoft windows every few days publish an announcement that a new security hole has been discovered , and u cant even change ur OS coz ur manager doesnt wanna , that's really a pain in the *** ,,,

all i'm looking for is a more secured operating system ,, i wish vista is what am i looking for !
 
Joined
Feb 9, 2008
Messages
1,862
You have to remember that Linux (Unix) has been around for almost 40 years with probably millions of people working on it all over the world during that time.
 
Joined
Jun 10, 2007
Messages
251
etch,,,,

It doesn't matter what OS you are running, Linux Windows Mac whatever
If a hacker is targeting you, they will get in, period.

Is windows as secure as Linux? Yes and No.

UAC helps a lot. But so does the firewall.
If you don't configure Linux properly, it can be just as insecure as any other OS and less secure in some instances.

Something else to consider. Windows has 80+ % of the market. With so many pieces of software that programmers don't think or care about security issues which opens holes.

Linux admins are begging for AntiVirus Suites for Linux. Mac users only think they are safe. These OS are what I call, Security through Obscurity.

Virus, Spyware, Malware dev's don't target them as it wont affect as many people due to difficulty but as important, market share.
 

etch

Thread Starter
Joined
Sep 20, 2008
Messages
35
i got ur point Orumph , yea its something considering the wide use of the OS ,,, when u think as a hacker , u wont hack some OS -like linux- thats not used broadly , or that would take a big time from u , and u sure it will be fixed the next day - lol - ,,
but i'm sure that microsoft was only interrested in GUI and End user easy use , no more -like it is for beginners!-

thats why i asked if they made vista for adults - j/k:p - i mean if they become aware of the threat of the other companies around them and started to give a big consideration to what they were missing -security!-.
 
Joined
Jun 10, 2007
Messages
251
Ok etch.

I challenge you to find and produce methods for accessing and explain the security holes that you claim are so prevalent in vista.

Oh, excuse me, your friend claims.

You are starting to show your ignorance, or you are a troll.

or dare i say,,,,,, a Linazi :eek:. Which are usually worse than trolls.
 
Joined
Jun 5, 2007
Messages
1,320
The number of bugs in any code can be expressed succinctly and mathematically:

Total Number of Errors = Number of Errors Found + 1
 

etch

Thread Starter
Joined
Sep 20, 2008
Messages
35
ok Orumph: u said ...

"I challenge you to find and produce methods for accessing and explain the security holes that you claim are so prevalent in vista.

Oh, excuse me, your friend claims.

You are starting to show your ignorance, or you are a troll.

or dare i say,,,,,, a Linazi :eek:. Which are usually worse than trolls."

why u show offence ! i was asking a simple question no more -_- , besides , i already discussed this matter with my friend i mentioned , and my opinion was exactly 100% like u wheni was speaking with him ...

and ok ,, i'll give ya a link -if i'm allowed to tho- that showes that some hackers have already reported security holes on vista ... and here are some links which already support what i'm saying ... (this is not an advertise! just an evidence to the case here ...)
http://www.vnunet.com/vnunet/news/2183507/vista-secirity-hole-discovered

and this one may get us to what i claimed -sorry i mean my friend!-
http://blogs.zdnet.com/security/?p=29&tag=nl.e589


i wish i wont get banned for posting such links , but really i dont like the way of speach --
cya and gl
 
Joined
Sep 21, 2007
Messages
13,671
Rutkowska's finding is old news. I look at it this way, if you ok an setup program, then of course it installs what it wants, including spyware, rootkit drivers, etc. She is looking for further finer grained access control, I think, and whereas I can accept the existing functionality. This 'security hole' is not that bad, in my opinion.

And I don't know why the MS guy gets into inteprocess communication and squatter attacks in response to her query.
.
 
Joined
Jun 10, 2007
Messages
251
I read those links.

Yes,, UAC is not implemented in the greatest way, but it's a step in the right direction.

But what they are discussing, is the software you install and are prompted to allow installing.
Again, this comes back to the user. Do you trust the software? Where you got it from?
If you don't install the software, then there is no security risk. UAC will prevent it from running.
You click ok and let it install,, your on your own, you were warned and you ignored it, the security breach is your fault as a user.

Find me something that doesn't require user interaction, social engineering tactics to compromise a vista system with UAC, firewall and a good antivirus enabled.

Even mac and Linux are susceptible to user interaction, social engineering tactics.
All I need to is to write a sub-program (maybe some supporting library for a prog) to compromise Linux or mac in someway that might disable something or replace a critical file, just like windows and granny grandma won't know the difference if the main program works as expected.
 
Status
This thread has been Locked and is not open to further replies. Please start a New Thread if you're having a similar issue. View our Welcome Guide to learn how to use this site.

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 1)

As Seen On
As Seen On...

Welcome to Tech Support Guy!

Are you looking for the solution to your computer problem? Join our site today to ask your question. This site is completely free -- paid for by advertisers and donations.

If you're not already familiar with forums, watch our Welcome Guide to get started.

Join over 807,865 other people just like you!

Latest posts

Staff online

Members online

Top