1. Computer problem? Tech Support Guy is completely free -- paid for by advertisers and donations. Click here to join today! If you're new to Tech Support Guy, we highly recommend that you visit our Guide for New Members.

Why doesn't everyone use Windows Server 2003?

Discussion in 'Windows XP' started by shanksta, Oct 12, 2003.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. shanksta

    shanksta Thread Starter

    Oct 11, 2003
    I dont know, but its way better than XP. Has anyone had any real problems with it?
  2. P3-450


    Oct 5, 2003
    XP is mostly designed for Home use and Windows Server 2003 is designed for servers.

    You will not find many home users upgrading to server 2k03 because there is no need.

    Win 2k server users may find this more of an appropiate move:)
  3. dvk01

    dvk01 Moderator Malware Specialist

    Dec 14, 2002
    First Name:
    Simple reason

    I cannot afford to pay uncle bill any more of my hard earned money until I actually have to

    XP works well enough and has only been out a short while, when my computer gets old and disabled (like me) then I will change it and will almost certainly install the latest & greatest operating system around at that time.

    There is absolutely no point in just throwing money away, just to keep up with the latest "improvement"

    And knowing uncle Bill's reputation I prefer to wait at least until the 1st service pack has come out and some of the bugs and sewcurity holes have been found and plugged

    I have no intention of being Uncle Bill's unpaid tester
  4. downtime


    Oct 21, 2002
    I agree on all points. It is better, not for home use, and have you looked at the price?
    I've had a few minor problems, like with Cold Fusion, but overall, its a great improvement. Keep in mind it's more like win2k than XP.
  5. JohnWill

    JohnWill Retired Moderator

    Oct 19, 2002
    Server versions of Windows are targeted to a different audience, and have different capabilities and requirements.
  6. tgm


    Oct 14, 2003
    If part of what your up to is to learn Windows in more depth, the server version is a good choice where there is all sorts of additional software that is important from a development perspective.

    I have yet to find a situation where typical workstation software will not run on the server version, but there is a significant number of applications that will NOT allow you to load their product on a server class machine. Usually the vendor has a version that will install under server but most often it is much more expensive than the workstation software. Beware!

    Micro$oft has yet to get it right on the first iteration of any product of theirs that I know of. The standard posture in most IT departments is to wait until the first service pack is issued for a product before placing it into a production environment (particularly it it is mission critical!).

    So if you have not purchased Windows 2003 server, get ready for sticker shock, it is very expensive. But I don't suggest that you run out and buy Windows 2000 server either. If you opt to buy 2003, you have downgrade rights to previous versions as part of the license agreement. So if you buy 2003, you can get the 2000 media from Micro$oft and keep the 2003 sorfware in a box until you are ready for it.
  7. Sponsor

As Seen On
As Seen On...

Welcome to Tech Support Guy!

Are you looking for the solution to your computer problem? Join our site today to ask your question. This site is completely free -- paid for by advertisers and donations.

If you're not already familiar with forums, watch our Welcome Guide to get started.

Join over 733,556 other people just like you!

Similar Threads - doesn't everyone Windows
  1. xITmasterx
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Short URL to this thread: https://techguy.org/171379

  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice