1. Computer problem? Tech Support Guy is completely free -- paid for by advertisers and donations. Click here to join today! If you're new to Tech Support Guy, we highly recommend that you visit our Guide for New Members.

Win XP vs Memturbo....Whos lying?

Discussion in 'Windows XP' started by Boo_Compaq, Apr 7, 2004.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
Advertisement
  1. Boo_Compaq

    Boo_Compaq Thread Starter

    Joined:
    May 9, 2003
    Messages:
    106
    Alright...so I have my paging file set to a constant 200 mb...Ive checked the actual file, and its sure enough, 200 mb. I load up memturbo, and it says i have 82% free of my page file at 923 mb....Any ideas? (and check my recycle bin error thing a little lower too..that needs some help :))

    Here's a screen shot
     

    Attached Files:

  2. Emtronics

    Emtronics

    Joined:
    Jan 20, 2000
    Messages:
    2,984
    It can be any number of things. For example: Is it reading the free space as FAT32 or NTFS? Is this a purchased program or shareware? In the "older" days back in Win95 and 98 I used to set my pagefile as RAM wasn't cheap and the more speed the better. Can I ask, why do you feel you need to set the pagefile in XP? No matter how much RAM one has, Windows is going to page out and with today's big hardrives, restricting the page file doesn't seem necessary.
     
  3. Boo_Compaq

    Boo_Compaq Thread Starter

    Joined:
    May 9, 2003
    Messages:
    106
    The reason i restrict my page file is if you don't windows will manage it, and it will eat up performance when it resizes the page file a lot. I realize that xp will page out some things no matter what, which is why i have a page file still. Restricting it to 200 mb will ensure that it doesnt eat up any resources it doesnt have to.

    As for the software....it is full version. Not sure about the fat32 vs ntfs issue though. Im just trying to make sure windows isnt lying to me and using up more space than i want it to.
     
  4. JohnWill

    JohnWill Retired Moderator

    Joined:
    Oct 19, 2002
    Messages:
    106,418
    Actually, I've never seen the swap space fragment or affect performance on either 2K or XP with sufficient real memory. I have between 512mb and 1gig on the systems here, and I let Windows manage the swap file. When I run the page defrag from Sysinternals, it always comes up with an unfragmented swap file.
     
  5. Boo_Compaq

    Boo_Compaq Thread Starter

    Joined:
    May 9, 2003
    Messages:
    106
    I suppose its really more a matter of preference, but i prefer to keep it like this. With a gig of ram, i cant exactly go wrong :)

    but thats not the issue....i just want to figure out if windows really has the page file at 200 mb...im assuming it is at 200 mb because ive checked pagefile.sys (as u can see in the screenshot), and sure enough, its 200 mb.

    Well no worries if i cant figure this out...just a little annoying. Im more concerned about my recycle bin issue....check that out for me pleeease

    http://forums.techguy.org/t217927.html
     
  6. Sponsor

As Seen On
As Seen On...

Welcome to Tech Support Guy!

Are you looking for the solution to your computer problem? Join our site today to ask your question. This site is completely free -- paid for by advertisers and donations.

If you're not already familiar with forums, watch our Welcome Guide to get started.

Join over 733,556 other people just like you!

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Short URL to this thread: https://techguy.org/218114

  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice